September 11th 2026
It's one of the first questions people ask me when they've got water coming through the ceiling, and honestly, it's a fair one. Roof work isn't cheap, and if there's a chance your insurer will foot the bill, you'd want to know before you start ringing around for quotes. So let's talk about it properly.
The short answer is: sometimes. The slightly longer answer is that it depends almost entirely on why your roof needs repairing, and that's the bit most people don't realise until they're on the phone to their insurer.
Here's the thing to get your head around first. Home and contents insurance in Victoria is built to cover sudden, one-off, accidental damage, what the policies call "insured events". Think a storm ripping tiles off, a tree branch coming through the roof, hail, fire, or something heavy landing on it. If a wild Melbourne storm rolls through overnight and you wake up to a hole where there wasn't one yesterday, that's the kind of thing insurance is designed for.
What it's generally not designed for is the slow stuff. Wear and tear, rust, ageing, tiles that have just gone brittle over thirty years, bedding and pointing that's crumbled away. Insurers treat all of that as maintenance, and maintenance is the homeowner's job, not theirs. I know that's not what anyone wants to hear, but it's the line nearly every policy draws, and it's worth knowing where it sits before you claim.
So a roof that's leaking because a storm damaged it? Often covered. A roof that's leaking because it's simply old and tired and nobody's touched it in years? Usually not.
Storm damage is far and away the most common roofing claim we see across Melbourne, and most building policies do cover it. But there's a catch that trips a lot of people up, so I'll be upfront about it.
When you claim for storm damage, the insurer will often send out an assessor, and one of the things they're quietly checking is whether the roof was in reasonable nick before the storm hit. If they decide the real culprit was years of neglect and the storm just finished off a roof that was already on its last legs, they can knock the claim back, or only pay for part of it. It feels harsh, but from their side it makes sense: they're covering the storm, not the decade of no maintenance that came before it.
This is exactly why keeping your roof maintained isn't just about avoiding leaks. A roof that's been looked after gives you a much stronger footing if you ever do need to claim. A bit of upkeep now can quietly save you a fight later.
This one catches people out more than you'd expect. Storm and flood are treated as two different things by most insurers, and they're not always both covered. Storm damage, meaning rain, wind, hail coming down onto your roof, is usually part of a standard policy. Flood, meaning rising water, is often a separate or optional cover you have to specifically have.
For roof repairs this usually isn't the issue, since roof damage is nearly always storm-related rather than flood-related. But it's worth knowing the distinction exists, because the wording in your policy matters and the two words are not interchangeable.
A few practical things people forget in the moment:
There's always an excess, the amount you pay before the insurer pays anything. If your repair is smaller than your excess, there's simply no point claiming, and you'll fix it faster just paying for it directly.
Pre-existing damage and dodgy previous workmanship are almost always excluded. If a leak traces back to a repair someone botched years ago, that's not something a home insurance policy is going to wear.
And the age of your roof can come into it. Some policies handle older roofs differently, and a very old roof can attract more scrutiny on a claim. It doesn't mean you can't claim, plenty of older Melbourne homes do, it just means the assessor will look a little harder.
Every policy is different, so the honest advice here is to actually read your Product Disclosure Statement, or ring your insurer and ask them straight. I'd rather you know where you stand than assume.
If you think you've genuinely got an insurable event, a few things go a long way:
Get up-to-date photos of the damage as soon as it's safe to, the more evidence the better. Don't throw out damaged materials until the assessor's seen them. Get the roof made safe to stop further damage (insurers expect you to prevent it getting worse, and most policies cover reasonable emergency work to do that). And get a proper written assessment from a licensed roofer that spells out what caused the damage, because "storm damage" written up clearly by someone who knows roofs carries a lot more weight than a homeowner's best guess.
That last point is where a good roofer earns their keep on an insurance job. We spend a fair bit of our time telling people the honest truth about what actually caused their leak, and when it is storm damage, saying so plainly and in writing helps enormously. If you'd like a hand with that, our roof repairs and maintenance team can take a look and give you a straight answer either way.
My honest take: if it's a genuine storm or accidental event and the repair comfortably exceeds your excess, it's usually worth lodging a claim. If it's wear and tear, an ageing roof, or a small job that's under your excess anyway, you're generally better off just getting it fixed and getting on with your life, and putting a bit of maintenance in place so the next storm doesn't catch you out.
Either way, don't let a leak sit. Water damage compounds fast, and a small fix today is nearly always cheaper than the ceiling repair, insulation and mould you're looking at if you leave it. If you're not sure where your roof stands, insured event or not, get in touch for a quote and we'll give you the honest version.
If your roof is leaking right now, call 0413 477 740.